Let op: om deze website goed te kunnen gebruiken is het noodzakelijk om Cookies aan te zetten. Meer informatie...

Convention Constitutionalism[e-boek e-boek]

On the Necessity of Judicial Review for Democratic Governance

R. Pierik

Convention Constitutionalism
Dit is een PDF PDF e-boek
Prijs: € 21,95
Voorraad#stock_type# onbekend
Let op: dit is een PDF PDF e-boek
Bestel je voor het eerst een digitaal product? Lees dan eerst de informatie over het bestellen, downloaden en gebruiken van digitale producten!
(Geen beoordelingen)
Delen:
Productspecificaties
EAN : 9789400114470
Auteur(s) : R. Pierik
Taal : English
Onderwerp : Recht
Thema : Methodes, theorie en rechtsfilosofie
Reeks : Maastricht Law Series (32)
Uitgever : Eleven international publishing
Verschenen : Juli 2024
Uitvoering : E-boek
Conditie : Nieuw
Pagina's : 30
Beschrijving

The European Court of Human Rights has been criticized for unduly interfering in democratic decision processes. Some argue that the unelected Strasbourg activists in robes should not interfere with democratic policy decisions that were made nationally. This inaugural lecture analyses this practice of rights-based judicial review by the Strasbourg Court. The first part presents a general legal-philosophical background. It explains that republicans, who emphasize the importance of the democratic way of self-governance, are in favour of weak forms of judicial review. Liberals, who prioritise the constitutionally protected fundamental rights, are in favour of strong judicial review. The second part employs this conceptual toolbox to describe and analyse judicial review as exercised by the Strasbourg Court since its inception in 1959. Should we understand it as strong, weak, or as something in between? I conclude that it is best understood as a weakened form of strong judicial review. The third part provides a normative discussion of the Strasbourg Court in the context of the emerging European constitutional landscape. It starts from the observation that the European Convention on Human Rights is first and foremost a collaboration of Party States that pursue congruent constitutional-democratic projects. This third part investigates the role of judicial review by the European Court in the ongoing dialogue with Party States in cementing a convention constitutionalism through the further strengthening of a European consensus on the content and impact of Convention rights. About the Maastricht Law Series: Created in 2018 by Boom juridisch and Eleven International Publishing in association with the Maastricht University Faculty of Law, the Maastricht Law Series publishes books on comparative, European and International law. The series builds upon the tradition of excellence in research at the Maastricht Faculty of Law, its research centers and the Ius Commune Research School. The Maastricht Law Series is a peer reviewed book series that allows researchers an excellent opportunity to showcase their work.

Velden met een * zijn verplicht